This short Executive AI Readiness Self-Assessment will help you evaluate your organization's readiness to successfully adopt AI. You'll receive:
An overall AI Readiness Score
Category scores across key readiness areas
Insights into potential gaps and risks
Please respond to each item as accurately and thoughtfully as possible based on your organization's current practices and context. All questions are optional but your full participation will ensure the most accurate and useful results.
Your responses are confidential and no individual data will be shared without permission.
By submitting this form, you agree to receive this resource and related follow-up communication from the AI Readiness & Adoption Alliance (AIRAA), including insights and next-step guidance. You can unsubscribe at any time. We will never sell or disclose your information.
18-28: The organization is at the beginning of its AI journey. Significant gaps likely exist across leadership alignment, governance, readiness, and infrastructure.
29-39: The organization recognizes the importance of AI and has begun exploring opportunities, but foundational capabilities remain underdeveloped.
40-50: Key building blocks are beginning to take shape. The organization is moving beyond exploration but still faces readiness gaps that could limit successful adoption.
51-61: Many of the structures needed for successful AI adoption are in place, including leadership support, planning, and organizational capability.
62-72: The organization demonstrates strong readiness across leadership, governance, workforce preparedness, and infrastructure, positioning it to scale AI effectively.
Significant Gap (3-5)
This area requires significant attention to support successful and sustainable AI adoption.
Early Development (6-7)
Foundational elements are emerging, though additional maturity is needed.
Established Foundation (8-9)
Core capabilities are in place and provide a strong basis for advancement.
Strong Capability (10-12)
This element demonstrates a high level of readiness and organizational maturity.